US President Donald Trump on Thursday received temporary approval to continue collecting tariffs under emergency powers, just a day after a separate court ruled that he had exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping levies on foreign imports.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the April 2 tariffs to remain in place while the White House appeals the trade court’s decision.
"The request for an immediate administrative stay is granted to the extent that the judgments and the permanent injunctions entered by the Court of International Trade in these cases are temporarily stayed until further notice while this court considers the motions papers," the court's order said, cited by The Independent.
Also Read: Federal court blocks Trump’s tariffs imposed under emergency powers
Earlier on Wednesday, the US court of international trade had ruled that Trump unlawfully invoked emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to declare a national emergency and slap tariffs on imports from nearly every country in the world. However, the Trump administration protested the court's ruling, initiating an appeal proceeding against the decision.
The ruling came as a major blow to Trump, whose turbulent trade policies rattled global markets, triggered supply chain chaos, and sparked concerns about inflation and sluggish growth.
Trump’s tariff policies are challenged in at least seven lawsuits. The US court of international trade's ruling stemmed from two combined cases: one from a group of five small businesses, and another from 12 US states.
“The reason that he chose IEEPA was he thought he could do this unilaterally without much oversight by Congress,” said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, who represented the small businesses. “The court saw through that.”
In its decision, the trade court pointed out that America has run trade deficits for nearly 50 years, hardly an urgent or unforeseen crisis.
Another judge, US district Judge Rudolph Contreras, also issued a narrower ruling on Thursday blocking tariffs applied to two Illinois-based educational toy companies, further complicating the president’s strategy.
The original IEEPA tariffs, introduced on what Trump called "Liberation Day," included up to 50 per cent duties on countries with trade surpluses against the US, and a 10 per cent baseline tariff for most others. Though Trump paused the steeper levies for 90 days to allow time for negotiation, he kept the lower ones in place.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the April 2 tariffs to remain in place while the White House appeals the trade court’s decision.
"The request for an immediate administrative stay is granted to the extent that the judgments and the permanent injunctions entered by the Court of International Trade in these cases are temporarily stayed until further notice while this court considers the motions papers," the court's order said, cited by The Independent.
Also Read: Federal court blocks Trump’s tariffs imposed under emergency powers
Earlier on Wednesday, the US court of international trade had ruled that Trump unlawfully invoked emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to declare a national emergency and slap tariffs on imports from nearly every country in the world. However, the Trump administration protested the court's ruling, initiating an appeal proceeding against the decision.
The ruling came as a major blow to Trump, whose turbulent trade policies rattled global markets, triggered supply chain chaos, and sparked concerns about inflation and sluggish growth.
Trump’s tariff policies are challenged in at least seven lawsuits. The US court of international trade's ruling stemmed from two combined cases: one from a group of five small businesses, and another from 12 US states.
“The reason that he chose IEEPA was he thought he could do this unilaterally without much oversight by Congress,” said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, who represented the small businesses. “The court saw through that.”
In its decision, the trade court pointed out that America has run trade deficits for nearly 50 years, hardly an urgent or unforeseen crisis.
Another judge, US district Judge Rudolph Contreras, also issued a narrower ruling on Thursday blocking tariffs applied to two Illinois-based educational toy companies, further complicating the president’s strategy.
The original IEEPA tariffs, introduced on what Trump called "Liberation Day," included up to 50 per cent duties on countries with trade surpluses against the US, and a 10 per cent baseline tariff for most others. Though Trump paused the steeper levies for 90 days to allow time for negotiation, he kept the lower ones in place.
You may also like
'Supporting one simple idea called India': Salman Khurshid's message amid Centre vs opposition over all-party outreach
Jurgen Klopp's ex-Liverpool assistant agrees shock move to Premier League rival
Rewa To Be Ahead Of Others In Development: Deputy CM Rajendra Shukla
'Next Victory: H-1B scam': MAGA now rallies behind Steve Bannon after China visa crackdown
Elon Musk's X crashes just hours after his Oval Office farewell appearance
